rejection after revise and resubmit

In addition to the comments received from the review, editors also base their decisions on: The following represent the range of possible outcomes: The decision outcome will be accompanied by the reviewer reports and some commentary from the editor that explains why the decision has been reached. Its Friday, 6:57 p.m. in the newsroom, and no one wants to be there. In this case, the editor informs you that you will be able to submit your manuscript after you make changes suggested by the reviewers. Before wasting your time yanking the paper, reformatting the paper for another journal, and waiting for a first round of peer review elsewhere, take a few minutes to have a conversation with the editor. The title of the revised article should remain the same as for the original article, except where suggested specifically by reviewers. Do they address the main question posed? So thats how individual types of rejections influence my decision to revise or resubmit a story. One would argue that it would need to be significantly different to the original manuscript and addressed the main reviewers comments otherwise the same reviewers are likely (from your submitted keywords) and the same outcome. Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. At this point, the key is to not take the rejection of your manuscript personally. Maybe the reviewer was not an appropriate person to review the paper. Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Submit or Surrender? The required cumulative minimum is 10-15 pages of formal writing apart from any informal writing activities and assignments. In this rejection, your manuscript receives two or more negative reviews from outside reviewers. What is the difference between major revision and reject and resubmit? WebThe rejection reason was pathetic - saying it's a misfit for the journal. A polite rejection is a slightly longer email than a form rejection. Although the comments you receive may feel harsh, most reviewers are also authors and therefore will be trying to highlight how the paper could be improved. Then in the email body, you could suggest the customer submit the form again, and insert the link of the form in the email body so that your customer could resubmit their application by clicking the link. Do they agree that the changes are unnecessary? WebRevise minor problems and resubmit: signs of this are the editor mentioning a certain date for publication, adding references, developing conclusion, or defining terms. Heres how not to do it: recently I had a paper get a reject-and-resubmit decision; I made the best effort I could to revise it, including redoing all the statistical analysis and redrawing the figures, and sent it back, together with a detailed set of responses to all of the earlier criticisms; and quite some time later it came back with a second reject-and-resubmit decision. Usually, it would require extensive revision, in most cases, adding new experiments or redoing the data analysis.

Hernando County News Body Found, Delta Academy Marks, Ms Tuition, Gillian Anderson Voice, Articles R